Skip to main content

Empowering Decentralized Intelligence: How Pocket Network Supports AI Agents

Machines are getting smarter and more independent due to artificial intelligence (AI). From decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN) to machine finance (MachineFi), the intersection of Web3 and the physical world requires a layer of autonomous intelligence that empowers trustless peer-to-peer collaboration.

Agentic AI is AI that acts without human intervention to achieve unique goals. An agent may create new agents, and multiple agents may collaborate on the same goal. Large language models (LLM) like ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), and Gemini (Google) are closed-source centralized systems. In contrast, decentralized AI – like DeepSeek and OpenLLaMA – consists of open-source tools and interoperable systems. 

For AI developers in Web3, the mission goes beyond creating smarter agents. It is about ensuring reliability, scalability, and alignment with Web3 principles. Because centralized infrastructure is susceptible to downtime, censorship, and inefficiency, it is insufficient for the needs of next-generation AI.

Picture this: an AI bot executing millions of dollars in trades during a volatile market swing. Suddenly, its centralized data provider suffers downtime. Sadly, transactions get delayed, and profits disappear. Trust in the bot’s reliability plummets. For developers and users alike, such scenarios expose the fragility of centralized infrastructure.

Relying on centralized application programming interfaces (APIs) and cloud systems to power web3 AI agents presents drawbacks, including high costs, censorship risks, and single points of failure. These issues not only hinder the efficiency of AI agents but also contradict the decentralized ethos of Web3.

Pocket Network goes beyond standard Web3 infrastructure. It is an open data layer designed to meet these challenges head-on. Pocket Network represents a transformative shift in how AI agents interact with blockchain ecosystems.

This article explores the role of AI agents in Web3, the challenges they face, and how Pocket Network’s developer support enables scalable, reliable, and intelligent systems across multitudes of AI agents and blockchain networks.

Introduction to Agentic AI: What are AI Agents in Web3? 

AI agents in Web3 are autonomous programs designed to interact seamlessly with blockchain networks, decentralized applications, and smart contracts. These intermediaries automate tasks, provide insights, and enhance user experience (UI), eliminating the need for manual oversight.

Their integration into Web3 marks a trend towards autonomous digital interactions. AI agents unlock unprecedented possibilities across various applications by leveraging machine learning models, LLMs, and blockchain data. They automate complex tasks such as liquidity management, trading strategy design, and risk analysis in decentralized finance (DeFi) with unparalleled precision. These agents are also reinventing Web3 content creation: dynamically generating, curating, and distributing tailored content that engages Web3 audiences. Beyond these applications, AI agents are essential in decentralized governance, supply chain operations, and personalized user experiences.

Categories and Examples of AI Agents in Web3

AI agents in Web3 can be categorized based on their functionalities. Below are categories of these agents, examples of their actions, and corresponding projects or protocols utilizing them:

1. Financial Agents

  1. Trading Insight Agents analyze market data to provide actionable trading recommendations. For example, AIXBT is an AI agent that tracks numerous top influencers on Twitter to deliver market insights.
  2. Automated Trading Agents execute trades based on predefined strategies. Fetch.ai, for instance, offers agents capable of optimizing strategies by analyzing market conditions and trading without human intervention.
  3. Portfolio Management Agents manage crypto portfolios by analyzing market data, rebalancing assets, and optimizing returns. An outstanding example is B-Cube AI Agents.

2. Content Creation and Social Media Agents

  1. Content Generation Agents produce content across platforms like Twitter, Discord, or Warpcast. Luna AI by Virtuals Protocol creates and shares content to grow its audience, including hiring artists and collaborating with other AI agents.
  2. Community Engagement Agents interact with community members, respond to inquiries, and foster engagement. AI-driven community engagement bots can host discussions, collect feedback, and organize events like Twitter Spaces or AMAs to drive user interaction.

3. Operational Agents: Manage critical processes in decentralized ecosystems, improving efficiency and transparency.

  1. Token Launch Agents oversee token launches by managing distribution schedules and monitoring market reception. For example, LiquidLaunch adjusts strategies in real time to ensure successful launches.
  2. Analytics Agents track KPIs, community engagement, and on-chain metrics. SubQuery’s Analytics Agents monitor performance in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) or decentralized applications (dApps) and offer actionable insights to optimize strategies.

The Unique Demands of AI Agents in Web3

AI agents must operate autonomously within the dynamic and decentralized environments of Web3, often taking on complex tasks that require more than basic AI computational capabilities.

These entities must navigate an intricate web of blockchain data, interact across multiple networks, and adapt in real time to changing conditions. Their success depends on infrastructure that provides high availability and scalability, supports their autonomy, and aligns with the decentralized principles of Web3.

The Challenges They Face

The potential of AI agents is, more often than not, constrained by various critical infrastructure challenges. These issues impact their reliability, scalability, and alignment with the decentralized ethos of blockchain ecosystems.

One of the primary challenges is reliability. AI agents depend on uninterrupted access to blockchain data to function effectively. However, centralized infrastructure introduces single points of failure, creating vulnerabilities that can disrupt operations. For instance, an outage in a centralized remote procedure call (RPC) provider can leave an AI agent blind to critical blockchain updates, resulting in missed transactions, inaccurate decisions, or even financial losses.

Scalability is another significant hurdle. As the number and complexity of AI agents increase, so does their demand for real-time blockchain data. Often designed for static or lower query volumes, traditional systems struggle to handle the dynamic, high-frequency workloads AI agents require, which usually leads to performance bottlenecks and latency issues, undermining their ability to respond in real time.

Cost is a further constraint, especially given the resource-intensive nature of AI agents. Traditional pay-per-query models can quickly become prohibitively expensive as query volumes scale. This cost unpredictability creates financial barriers to growth and innovation for developers working on high-demand use cases, such as agents analyzing DeFi markets or managing token launches.

Security and privacy also present significant challenges. Centralized infrastructure inherently consolidates data and control in one place, increasing the risk of breaches or surveillance. This lack of data security undermines trust and compromises the functionality of AI agents handling sensitive information or proprietary algorithms.

Perhaps the most fundamental challenge lies in decentralization alignment. Web3 operates on trustlessness and autonomy, and relying on centralized RPC providers contradicts these ideals. AI agents built on centralized infrastructure risk becoming dependent on entities that can impose restrictions, censor data, or prioritize certain users over others. This misalignment undermines the core philosophy of decentralization.

These challenges underscore the need for a robust, scalable, decentralized infrastructure like Pocket Network. Addressing them is essential to unlocking the true potential of AI agents in Web3.

Pocket Network Decentralized API vs Centralized APIs

How Pocket Network Addresses These Needs

First Things First, What Is Pocket Network?

Pocket Network is a decentralized RPC infrastructure protocol that provides reliable, scalable, and censorship-resistant access to blockchain data. At its core, it acts as an open data layer with a global network of independent node operators who process and relay data requests between decentralized applications and blockchain ecosystems.

It replaces centralized RPC providers with a distributed model and eliminates single points of failure, ensuring that data flows seamlessly, even under high demand or network stress.

Built to align with the decentralized ethos of Web3, Pocket Network leverages a unique economic model. Developers and applications access the network by staking Pocket’s native currency, POKT, ensuring predictable costs without the unpredictability of traditional pay-as-you-go pricing. Meanwhile, node operators are incentivized through rewards for processing relays, creating a self-sustaining system that encourages robust participation and high-quality service.

Pocket supports various blockchain networks, including Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana, enabling interoperability and facilitating multi-chain capabilities. This architecture makes it an essential backbone for AI agents, DeFi protocols, non-fungible token (NFT) platforms, and any application requiring constant, secure, decentralized access to blockchain data.

Over sixty chains integrated into Pocket Network

How Pocket Network Makes Web3 AI Agents Possible – A Decentralized Solution

Pocket Network is a decentralized RPC and open data provider that addresses AI agents’ core obstacles in Web3. Its architecture and economic model are purpose-built to overcome these challenges, ensuring developers can build resilient and scalable systems without compromise. Its core principles include the following:

Web3-Native AI Agents

At its core, Pocket’s architecture comprises thousands of independent node operators who process data requests, ensuring the network’s resilience and scalability. By distributing queries across these networks of independent node operators, Pocket eliminates single points of failure. 

This decentralization ensures high uptime and outage resistance, making it ideal for mission-critical AI agents. An AI agent managing fast transactions in DeFi liquidity pools with Pocket will remain unaffected even if several nodes in the network go offline.

Scalability and Performance
Pocket Network’s infrastructure is designed to handle massive query volumes, with over 868 billion relays served to date. This robust system ensures developers can deploy AI agents requiring real-time, high-frequency data access from multiple blockchains without compromising performance. 

Suppose an AI agent monitors NFT marketplaces across multiple blockchains, such as Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana. Pocket’s infrastructure allows the agent to fetch cross-chain data concurrently, ensuring timely decision-making without performance degradation.

Cost Optimization

Pocket’s token-based economy offers a predictable and cost-effective alternative to pay-as-you-go pricing. Developers stake Pocket tokens (POKT) for consistent and reliable access to the network. This model ensures scalability without unpredictable costs, an essential benefit for AI projects with fluctuating workloads.

Pocket Network’s Developer-Centric Features for AI Agents

Developing AI agents in Web3 demands an infrastructure that is robust and tailored to handle complex, multi-chain environments. Below are the various developer-friendly approaches Pocket Network employs to address these challenges:

Comprehensive SDKs and APIs for Blockchain Integration

Pocket Network offers software development kits (SDKs) and APIs to simplify access to its decentralized relay network. Features include:

  • Multi-Chain Configuration: Using chains.json, developers can define chain-specific IDs to enable seamless interactions across 50+ supported blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and Avalanche.
  • Optimized Query Management: Pre-configured endpoints reduce latency and simplify requests, allowing AI agents to fetch real-time data efficiently across chains.
  • Scalable Integration: The SDKs abstract much of the complexity of managing blockchain interactions, reducing the time required for deployment and enabling developers to focus on logic rather than infrastructure.

Decentralized Relay Architecture for Cross-Chain Operations

Pocket’s relay network handles hundreds of millions of daily relays, distributing data requests across thousands of nodes. This architecture ensures:

  1. Concurrent Query Execution: AI agents can handle multiple data requests simultaneously, enabling cross-chain analytics and multi-market monitoring operations.
  2. High-Throughput Performance: The relay network is optimized for low-latency data delivery and critical for high-frequency AI workloads such as trading bots or NFT valuation engines.
  3. Middleware-Free Interactions: Pocket reduces development overhead while maintaining consistency across chains by bypassing the need for additional middleware.

Advanced Monitoring for Performance Optimization

Using gateway packages like Path, Pocket provides developers with detailed dashboards that track metrics such as:

  1. Relay Latency: Ensures that data requests are processed with minimal delay.
  2. Throughput and Error Rates: Identifies bottlenecks or potential issues, allowing developers to fine-tune configurations for maximum efficiency.
  3. Node Reliability: Monitors node performance across the network, ensuring consistent uptime for AI agents managing critical workloads.

Modular Infrastructure for Scalable Development

The modular nature of Pocket’s architecture allows developers to adapt their systems incrementally. Features include:

  1. Dynamic Blockchain Integration: Developers can expand supported chains by adding new chain IDs in their configurations without disrupting existing workflows.
  2. Incremental Scaling: Pocket’s infrastructure supports gradual increases in query loads, making it ideal for AI projects that grow in complexity over time.
Pocket network’s Decentralized AI stack

Take the Next Step with Pocket Network

Building at the intersection of Web3 and AI is easier than you think! By leveraging the right tools, documentation, and community support, you can work with Web3-native AI agents. Here’s how you can begin via Pocket Network:

  1. Explore Developer Documentation
    Access the developer portal for guides on configuring chains.json, setting up RPC endpoints, and optimizing multi-chain interactions. These resources simplify integration and enhance performance for your AI projects.
  2. Stake POKT Tokens
    Once Shannon is live, gain reliable access to Pocket’s network by staking at least 15,001 POKT tokens, which ensures stable, scalable access to blockchain data, supporting projects with high query volumes and multi-chain needs.
  3. Utilize Gateways
    Use Pocket-supported gateways like Grove and Nodies to manage RPC endpoints, streamline multi-chain queries, and monitor relay performance. These tools enhance reliability and reduce operational complexity.
  4. Join the Pocket Network Community
    Connect with a vibrant developer and node operator community on our Discord dedicated to advancing decentralized infrastructure. Participate in forums, DAO discussions, and collaborative initiatives to share ideas and contribute to developing resilient Web3 solutions.

Final Thoughts

Building truly autonomous AI agents in Web3 requires more than invention—it demands an infrastructure that aligns with the principles of decentralization. Pocket Network provides a foundation for these agents to operate reliably, scalably, and independently.

Every relay and every interaction is a step toward creating robust systems that reflect the ethos of Web3, creating an opportunity for developers to redefine what’s possible to develop agents as resilient as the ecosystems they serve. The question is no longer whether decentralization matters; it’s how we choose to harness it.